|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aaron Mirrorsaver
R.E.C.O.N.
   |
Posted - 2007.10.21 19:09:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Aaron Mirrorsaver on 21/10/2007 19:11:33
I don't fly carriers, never seen them in much action. But as soon as I read that blog, my feelings echoed that of 95% of the people here. It is a terrible idea.
Firstly a carrier doesn't do that much damage with nine deployed fighters anyway. I mean about 7-800 dps?
Secondly, you stated you want carriers to be more then -keep-other-ships-alive-while-having-alittle-firepower-kind-of ship..... sorry dude but that role is already filled by logistics ships. So what we have here is a 1 billion costing logistic tech 1 ship aka the carrier. You want a keep alive ship? Field logistics.
And oh a motherships bbqs battleships with 19 fighters quickly, well 20bn dollar ship against a 250 million ship kinda hurts.
I think the problem is that CCP never expected there to be so many carrier pilots and cap ships on the field of battle, its clear because from the Patch notes for RMR(carriers with that expansion right?) they said, every alliance will be expected to field at least one on the battle field, yeah right, and they underestimated the richness of alliances in this game to replace said carriers at will etc etc. and have large capitals fleets.
I was going to train for carriers myself, but they'll be expensive and useless and not worth the price for the ship + fitting after this nerf.
no offense but I think you should go back to Q/A.
 Quote:
Come on Star Trek Online
Well that one might be DOA, dont expect to see it before 2010 the way its going... in development since 2004? Even stargate worlds started after sto and is almost done.
R.E.C.O.N. is recruiting
|
Aaron Mirrorsaver
R.E.C.O.N.
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:44:00 -
[2]
dude it wasn't QA that came up with this, its a guy who has been in QA for two years and just got a promotion to the design team.
he will wtf pwn bbq eve with this promotion.
Let's not let carriers be able to kill battleships. I mean WW2 saw the replacement of the BS by carriers as the most important ships in the fleet.
Rename the class of ship, cause it aint a carrier no more.
R.E.C.O.N. is recruiting
|
Aaron Mirrorsaver
R.E.C.O.N.
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:57:00 -
[3]
you comparing the ability of a 20+ billion ship ability to defend it self with the ability of a tech 2 logistic ship? and saying that is ok if they are the same?
o m g
R.E.C.O.N. is recruiting
|
Aaron Mirrorsaver
R.E.C.O.N.
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 23:34:00 -
[4]
Quote:
Carriers never should have been the solopwnmobiles they became.
oh yeah they are wtf bbbq solon pwn mobiles.... shows how knowledgable on the subject.
R.E.C.O.N. is recruiting
|
|
|
| |
|